Aaron Lamas Monroy v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202220-72741California1,184 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON LAMAS MONROY, No. 20-72741

Petitioner, Agency No. A079-387-054

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 5, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: SILER,*** CALLAHAN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Aaron Lamas Monroy (“Petitioner” or “Monroy”), a native and

citizen of Mexico, appeals a final order issued by the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Appeals (“BIA”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the

petition. The BIA found that in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.