Luis Ballinas-Lucero v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 202217-73260California6,289 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS MAXIMINO BALLINAS-LUCERO, No. 17-73260 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-154-807

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 15, 2022 San Francisco, California

Filed August 15, 2022

Before: William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher BALLINAS-LUCERO V. GARLAND

SUMMARY*

Immigration

Granting Luis Maximino Ballinas-Lucero’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, and remanding, the panel held that: 1) an applicant for cancellation of removal bears the burden of proving that a conviction was vacated because of a substantive or procedural defect in the criminal proceedings, and not solely for immigration purposes or for rehabilitative or equitable reasons; and 2) Ballinas-Lucero carried this burden of proof.

In 2012, Ballinas-Lucero pleaded guilty, without counsel, to six misdemeanor theft charges. The BIA later concluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.