Salazar

Salazar v. Salazar CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2022C092727California218 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 8/15/22 Salazar v. Salazar CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

ISRAEL C. SALAZAR, C092727

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2018- 00246743-PR-TR-FRC) v.

RICARDO SALAZAR, as Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

In a signed order filed on December 6, 2019, the trial court denied appellant Israel C. Salazar’s petition challenging the validity of a living trust. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that order on August 25, 2020. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 180 days after the trial court’s appealable order was filed, the notice of appeal is untimely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1)(C), (e).) Because we have no jurisdiction to consider this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.