Brandon Harvey v. Morgan Stanley LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 202219-16955California2,340 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON HARVEY, individually and on No. 19-16955 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02835-WHO Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY

LLC,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

MATHEW LUCADANO; TRACY CHEN,

Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiffs,

Movants-Appellants.

BRANDON HARVEY, individually and on No. 20-15509 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02835-WHO Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MATHEW LUCADANO,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Objector-Appellant,

v.

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY

LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

BRANDON HARVEY, individually and on No. 20-15510 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02835-WHO Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TRACY CHEN,

Objector-Appellant,

v.

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY

LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

BRANDON HARVEY, individually…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.