Peyton

Filed 8/16/22 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B314992

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. ZM014741 v. & ZM011411)

FRANKLIN PEYTON et al., ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

Defendants and REHEARING Appellants.

NO CHANGE IN THE

JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 28, 2022, be modified as follows: 1. On page 17, before the first full sentence, which begins with “Petitioners,” insert the following:

Citing the Legislative Counsel’s Digest to the 2013 bill that amended the Act to its current form, which indicates that the 2013 bill was meant to “make nonsubstantive, organizational changes” to the Act (Legis. Counsel’s Dig., Sen. Bill No. 295 (2013-2014 Reg. Sess.), Stats. 2013, ch. 182, Summary Dig.), petitioners contend we must read the current statutory language to have the same effect as the November 2006 version of the Act. Because the Digest is “not part…