Sanceri

Sanceri v. Anderson CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2022B307979California2,369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 8/16/22 Sanceri v. Anderson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KATHERINE SANCERI, B307979

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC066546 v.

BARBARA ANDERSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Olivia Rosales, Judge. Affirmed.

Velasco Law Group and Richard J. Radcliffe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Klinkert, Gutierrez & Neavel and James E. Klinkert for Defendant and Respondent. _________________________ Plaintiff Katherine Sanceri sued her sister, Barbara Anderson, alleging Anderson owed her part of the proceeds from the sale of property that once belonged to their father. The trial court granted summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.