Shustak Reynolds & Partners v. Weisbord CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2022D079169California8,195 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/17/22 Shustak Reynolds & Partners v. Weisbord CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SHUSTAK REYNOLDS & PARTNERS, D079169

P.C.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- v. 00066060-CU-BC-CTL)

JOSHUA WEISBORD et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Affirmed. The Nalu Law Firm, Michael Nalu; Williams Iagmin and Jon R. Williams for Defendants and Appellants. Shustak Reynolds & Partners and Paul A. Reynolds for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendants Joshua Weisbord (Joshua) and his father Barry Weisbord (Barry) (collectively, the Weisbords) appeal the trial court order and resulting judgment affirming…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.