Valley Honey v. East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2022C093454California6,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/17/22 Valley Honey v. East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

VALLEY HONEY, INC., et al., C093454

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No.

STKCVUOT201800000071)

v.

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT,

Defendant and Respondent.

In any negligence suit, a plaintiff must demonstrate “ ‘a legal duty to use due care, a breach of such legal duty, and [that] the breach [is] the proximate or legal cause of the resulting injury.’ ” (Beacon Residential Community Assn. v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (2014) 59 Cal.4th 568, 573.) In this case, plaintiffs Valley Honey, Inc. and Christobal Espinosa (collectively plaintiffs) sued defendant East Bay Municipal Utility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.