Usdc-Casj

Sweta Sonthalia v. Usdc-Casj

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202222-70044California748 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SWETA SONTHALIA, No. 22-70044 ______________________________ D.C. No. 5:21-cv-06374-BLF

SWETA SONTHALIA,

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM*

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE,

Respondent,

VIEW, INC., FKA CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Argued and Submitted August 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON, BADE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Sweta Sonthalia petitions for a writ of mandamus to vacate the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. order declining to appoint her as lead plaintiff in this securities fraud action under

the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1651 and deny the writ.

A writ of mandamus is a “drastic and extraordinary remedy reserved for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.