Miller v. Bernie CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 2022F080064California8,763 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/18/22 Miller v. Bernie CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHARLES A. MILLER,

F080064

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Kings Super. Ct. No. 12C0112) v.

KEVIN F. BERNIE, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Kathy Ciuffini, Judge. Charles A. Miller, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Scampini, Mortara & Harris, Haig A. Harris, Jr., and Neil S. Turner for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Charles Anderson Miller appeals after he was designated as a vexatious litigant who was unlikely to prevail on the merits of his lawsuit and had his case dismissed when he could not post the required security ordered by the trial court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391.3.)1 In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.