William Mendenhall v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 202221-35464California416 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM H. MENDENHALL, No. 21-35464
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00312-SLG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 8, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska
Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
William H. Mendenhall appeals the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit
under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), alleging negligence and civil rights
violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The parties are familiar
with the facts, so we do not recount them here.
The district court properly dismissed Mendenhall’s negligent handling claim
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. as a “claim arising out of assault, battery, [or] false imprisonment,” 28 U.S.C.