Mitchell Taebel v. County of Maricopa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 202221-16919California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 18 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL TAEBEL, No. 21-16919

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01294-ROS-CDB v.

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; DOUG MEMORANDUM*

DUCEY, AZ Governor; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ Attorney General; MARICOPA COUNTY

OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE

SERVICES; MARICOPA COUNTY

PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE;

DONALD J. TRUMP; WILLIAM G.

MONTGOMERY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2022 ** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell Taebel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and order

of dismissal for failure to state a claim.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.