Mitchell Taebel v. County of Maricopa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 202221-16919California340 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 18 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MITCHELL TAEBEL, No. 21-16919
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01294-ROS-CDB v.
COUNTY OF MARICOPA; DOUG MEMORANDUM*
DUCEY, AZ Governor; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ Attorney General; MARICOPA COUNTY
OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
SERVICES; MARICOPA COUNTY
PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE;
DONALD J. TRUMP; WILLIAM G.
MONTGOMERY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 16, 2022 ** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Mitchell Taebel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and order
of dismissal for failure to state a claim.…