Courtney

Courtney v. Daimler Trucks North Am. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 2022B304945California16,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/18/22 Courtney v. Daimler Trucks North Am. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

SHANISHA COURTNEY et al., B304945

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC615223)

v.

DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH

AMERICA LLC,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders and judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Vicencia, Judge. Reversed in part and affirmed in part. The Homampour Law Firm, Arash Homampour, Corey Arzoumanian, Nareen Touloumdjian; Law Offices of David H. Greenberg, David H. Greenberg, Emily A. Ruby; Esner, Chang & Boyer, Stuart B. Esner and Kevin K. Nguyen for Plaintiffs and Appellants Shanisha Courtney, Raymond Courtney and Martel Courtney. Polsinelli, David K.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.