Nordyke v. King

Good Law
364 F.3d 1025
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 200499-17551California7,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

364 F.3d 1025 Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl David; Tasiana Wertyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair; R.A. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty, County of Alameda; The County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-17551. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed April 5, 2004. Before: ALARCÓN, O'SCANNLAIN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. ORDER The panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges O'Scannlain and Gould voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Alarcón so recommended. The panel requested a vote of the full court on whether the case should be reconsidered en banc. A majority of the active nonrecused judges of the court failed to vote in favor of rehearing en banc, and the petition is therefore denied. With this order the clerk shall also file Judge Kozinski's concurrence, Judge Kleinfeld's dissent from denial, and Judge Gould's dissent from denial. The stay of the issuance of the mandate is vacated. KOZINSKI,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.