Kimberly Askew v. County of Clark

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202221-15310California1,089 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY TERESE ASKEW, No. 21-15310

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02026-APG-BNW v.

COUNTY OF CLARK; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 9, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Kimberly Terese Askew appeals from the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Clark County, the

Animal Foundation (the “Foundation”), Tiffany Bonnell, Stephanie Clevinger, and

Jason Allswang (collectively, the “County Defendants”), and Defendant-Appellee

Sandra Southwell, on Askew’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Nevada law.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.