Great Lakes Insurance Se v. Tamara Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 202221-56231California1,232 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 22 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE, No. 21-56231
Plaintiff-Appellee, DC No. 5:20-cv-00586-AB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAMARA LEE SMITH,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 25, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Tamara Lee Smith appeals from the judgment entered after the district court
granted summary judgment in favor of Great Lakes Insurance SE. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate the judgment and remand
for further proceedings.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The doctrine of uberrimae fidei “‘imposes a duty of utmost good faith,’ so
‘an applicant for a marine insurance policy is bound to reveal every fact within his
[or her] knowledge that is material to the risk.’” N.H. Ins. Co.…