Urick

Urick v. Greenspoon Marder CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2022B313277California5,636 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moor, J.

Filed 8/22/22 Urick v. Greenspoon Marder CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DANA URICK et al., B313277

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV49933) v.

GREENSPOON MARDER LLP et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, Maureen Duffy-Lewis, Judge. Affirmed. Greenspoon Marder, John H. Pelzer and Germain D. Labat for Defendants and Appellants. Ulwelling Law, James K. Ulwelling and Lauren E. Saint for Plaintiffs and Respondents. _______________________________

Former trustee Dana Urick brought an action individually and as guardian ad litem for her son Trentyn M. Urick-Stasa against her former attorneys, James H. Turken and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.