Marshall

Marshall v. Medical Board of California CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2022B308582California2,621 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 8/23/22 Marshall v. Medical Board of California CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

GRANVILLE H. MARSHALL, B308582

Petitioner and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCP00889) v.

MEDICAL BOARD OF

CALIFORNIA,

Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James C. Chalfant, Judge. Dismissed. Pierce & Shearer and Andrew F. Pierce for Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Gloria L. Castro, Assistant Attorney General, Robert McKim Bell and Trina L. Saunders, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. __________________________ Granville H. Marshall, M.D., appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court denied his petition for a writ of administrative mandate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.