Dias & Fragoso v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2022F082219California10,618 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/23/22 Dias & Fragoso v. Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIAS & FRAGOSO, INC., et al.,

F082219

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 20C-0117) v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA OPINION

HIGHWAY PATROL,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Kathy Ciuffini, Judge. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson, Assistant Attorney General, Heather Hoesterey and Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. Sagaser, Watkins & Wieland, Howard A. Sagaser and Lisa M. Horton for Plaintiffs and Respondents. -ooOoo-

SEE CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

Commercial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.