United States v. Paul Loisel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202218-10018California367 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10018

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00058-APG-VCF-1 v.

PAUL DANIEL LOISEL, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Paul Daniel Loisel appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea convictions and aggregate 300-month sentence for five counts of

interference with commerce by robbery and one count of discharge of a firearm

during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1851 and 924(c)(1)(A),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). respectively. Pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.