Rudy Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202220-16365California452 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUDY D. MARTIN, an individual, No. 20-16365

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-05119-EJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Rudy D. Martin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging violations of state law in connection with his home

loan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Nevada

v. Bank of Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2012) (denial of a motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). remand); Cervantes v. United States, 330 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.