Michael Hayes v. Tyler Nicodemus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202221-35037California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL T. HAYES, No. 21-35037

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00226-BLW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TYLER NICODEMUS, Sgt.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MATTHEW LEE ALEXANDER, 103811;

TERRY RASAR, 110719; ADAM MILLER,

Sgt.; WALTON, Corporal; JOHN

MCMAHON; BROWN, C865,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Idaho state prisoner Michael T. Hayes appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging failure-to-

protect. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.