Michael Hayes v. Tyler Nicodemus
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202221-35037California309 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL T. HAYES, No. 21-35037
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00226-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TYLER NICODEMUS, Sgt.,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
MATTHEW LEE ALEXANDER, 103811;
TERRY RASAR, 110719; ADAM MILLER,
Sgt.; WALTON, Corporal; JOHN
MCMAHON; BROWN, C865,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Idaho state prisoner Michael T. Hayes appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging failure-to-
protect. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
district…