Linda Alexander v. City of Richland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202220-35321California391 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA ALEXANDER, No. 20-35321

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-05263-TOR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF RICHLAND, Code Enforcement Board of Richland Police Department; CITY

OF RICHLAND CITY COUNCIL;

THOMPSON, Mayor, City of Richland; REENTS, Manager, City of Richland;

LINDSEY BLANCHARD; CERISE PECK;

MIKE HARRISON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Linda Alexander appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.