James Mouser v. Charles Ryan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202219-15685California674 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES M. MOUSER, No. 19-15685

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00714-JJT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, sued in individual and official capacity,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

James M. Mouser, a person incarcerated in Arizona state prison, appeals pro

se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Al Haramain Islamic Found., Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.