Darren Heyman v. State of Nevada

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202221-16377California1,262 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 23 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARREN HEYMAN, No. 21-16377

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01228-APG-BNW v.

STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel; on behalf of MEMORANDUM* Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education; on behalf of University of Nevada, Las Vegas; NEAL

SMATRESK; DONALD SNYDER;

STOWE SHOEMAKER; RHONDA

MONTGOMERY; CURTIS LOVE;

SARAH TANFORD; PHILIP BURNS;

KRISTIN MALEK; LISA MOLL-CAIN;

DEBRA L. PIERUSCHKA; ELDA M.

SIDHU,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted August 22, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Darren Heyman appeals pro se the district court’s decision to remand his

case to Nevada state court and various rulings rendered prior to remand. Heyman

instituted this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.