Claudia Portillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202216-72257California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLAUDIA ESMERALDA PORTILLO; et No. 16-72257 al., Agency Nos. A206-848-818 Petitioners, A206-848-819

A206-848-799

v. A206-848-800

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Claudia Esmeralda Portillo and her children, natives and citizens of El

Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

applications for asylum and denying Portillo’s applications for withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.