Brenda Lechuga Munguia v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 202219-72552California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 23 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENDA LECHUGA MUNGUIA, No. 19-72552

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-880-128

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON, BADE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner Brenda Lechuga Munguia (Petitioner), a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) dismissing her appeal from the denial of her application for cancellation of

removal. We lack jurisdiction to review Petitioner’s challenge to the denial, and

we DISMISS the petition for review.

1. We first consider whether we have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.