T. Phillips v. Vincent Ochoa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202221-16030California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

T. MATTHEW PHILLIPS; ALI No. 21-16030

SHAHROKHI,

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00483-APG-NJK Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

VINCENT OCHOA, Clark County District Court Judge, Family Division; MATHEW HARTER, Clark County District Court Judge, Family Division; C AARON FORD, Nevada Attorney General,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

T. Matthew Philips and Ali Shahrokhi appeal from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). related to a family…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.