Stephen Iwaniszek v. Pride Transport, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202221-15945California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN J. IWANISZEK, No. 21-15945

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02918-JCM-BNW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PRIDE TRANSPORT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Stephen J. Iwaniszek appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims, including under the

Americans with Disabilities Act, arising from his employment at Pride Transport.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court dismissed the action for Iwaniszek’s failure to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.