Dina Karamoy v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202215-71860California404 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DINA KARAMOY; et al., No. 15-71860

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A095-315-677

A095-315-678

v. A095-315-679

A095-315-680

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Dina Karamoy and her three adult children, natives and citizens of

Indonesia, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.