Comerica Bank v. Mark Schnizlein

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202221-15019California466 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COMERICA BANK, Nos. 21-15019 21-15380 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00816-CDB v.

MARK SCHNIZLEIN, DBA Westbrook MEMORANDUM* Builders LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

MY ANGELS GIFTS LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Camille D. Bibles, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted August 17, 2022***

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In these consolidated appeals, Mark Schnizlein appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment in an interpleader action brought by Comerica Bank. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.