Ali Shahrokhi v. Jerome Tao

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202221-16171California251 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALI SHAHROKHI, No. 21-16171

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02346-GMN-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEROME T. TAO; BONNIE BULLA;

MICHAEL P. GIBBONS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Ali Shahrokhi appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and based on absolute immunity. Milstein

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Cooley, 257 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.