Ali Shahrokhi v. Jerome Tao
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 202221-16171California251 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALI SHAHROKHI, No. 21-16171
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02346-GMN-VCF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEROME T. TAO; BONNIE BULLA;
MICHAEL P. GIBBONS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Ali Shahrokhi appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and based on absolute immunity. Milstein
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Cooley, 257 F.3d…