Zachary Silbersher v. Allergan, Inc.

Good Law
46 F.4th 991
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-15420California4,564 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE No. 21-15420

OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF

COLORADO; STATE OF D.C. No. CONNECTICUT; STATE OF 3:18-cv-03018-

DELAWARE; STATE OF FLORIDA; JCS

STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF

HAWAII; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE

OF INDIANA; STATE OF IOWA; STATE OPINION

OF LOUISIANA; STATE OF

MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN;

STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF

MONTANA; STATE OF NEVADA;

STATE OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF

NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK;

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE

OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF RHODE

ISLAND; STATE OF TENNESSEE;

STATE OF TEXAS; STATE OF

VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON;

COMMONWEALTH OF

MASSACHUSETTS; COMMONWEALTH

OF VIRGINIA; DISTRICT OF

COLUMBIA, ex rel ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. ALLERGAN, INC.; ALLERGAN USA,

INC.; ALLERGAN SALES, LLC;

FOREST LABORATORIES HOLDINGS,

LTD.; ADAMAS PHARMA LLC;

ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.