Ambriz

Ambriz v. Cerda CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2022F083750California1,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/25/22 Ambriz v. Cerda CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JESSICA AMBRIZ,

F083750

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 21CECG01813) v.

HECTOR ARMANDO CERDA, JR., OPINION Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Mark E. Cullers, Judge. Hector Armando Cerda, Jr., in pro. per., for Appellant. Michelle Pepper for Respondent. -ooOoo- Hector Armando Cerda, Jr., who has represented himself throughout these proceedings, appeals from a civil harassment restraining order that protects his niece, Jessica Ambriz, and her two children from him. Cerda contends the trial court erred in entering the order because he was acting out of his concern for the children’s safety as a

* Before Smith, Acting P. J.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.