Rogelio Castro v. Ppg Industries, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-55340California1,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO CASTRO, individually, and on No. 21-55340 behalf of members of the general public similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02110-PA-MRW Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 11, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Rogelio Castro appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of his

former employers, PPG Industries, Inc.; Sierracin Corporation; and Sierracin/Sylmar

Corporation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part,

dismiss in part, and reverse in part.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Jurisdiction. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.