Rodney Moore v. Charles Ryan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202220-16504California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODNEY D. MOORE, No. 20-16504

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04543-JAT-DMF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES L. RYAN; UNKNOWN

PARTIES, T.S.U. Officers at Arizona Department of Corrections; DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC Director; HERNANDEZ, Named as Hernandez John/Jane Doe;

JACKIE HUTCHINSON; C. R. GLYNN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Rodney D. Moore appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1983 action alleging Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.