Jay Olson v. Idaho Department of Correction

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-35587California484 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAY CHRIS OLSON, No. 21-35587

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00066-BLW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Jay Chris Olson appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference

and excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.