Jagjit Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202217-70396California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 25 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGJIT SINGH, No. 17-70396

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-052-997

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 10, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: BERZON, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jagjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) final order dismissing Singh’s claims for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief pursuant to the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. part and deny in part Singh’s petition for review. Because the parties are familiar

with the facts, we do not recite them here.

We confine our review to the BIA’s decision except where the BIA adopts

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.