UPS

Holly Perez v. UPS

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-16538California2,943 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

HOLLY PEREZ, No. 21-16538 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-08050-WHO v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 16, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Holly Perez appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment to Defendant-Appellee United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) in this

employment discrimination action. The district court had jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1332(a), and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

I

We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s evidentiary rulings. See

Wong v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 410 F.3d 1052, 1060 (9th Cir. 2005).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.