Brian Johnson v. Pritz Navaratnasingam

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-35968California455 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN K. JOHNSON, No. 21-35968

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01215-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PRITZ NAVARATNASINGAM, Director V.A. Regional Office; MIKE KWAITER, Claim Adjustor; MICHAEL TEDYCH, Director of V.A. Hospital;

VANDERWALKER; BROWN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Brian K. Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action concerning veteran’s disability benefits. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bishop Paiute Tribe v.

Inyo County,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.