Brian Johnson v. Pritz Navaratnasingam
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-35968California455 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRIAN K. JOHNSON, No. 21-35968
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01215-RSL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PRITZ NAVARATNASINGAM, Director V.A. Regional Office; MIKE KWAITER, Claim Adjustor; MICHAEL TEDYCH, Director of V.A. Hospital;
VANDERWALKER; BROWN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Brian K. Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action concerning veteran’s disability benefits. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bishop Paiute Tribe v.