Andrea Wood v. County of Contra Costa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 202221-16183California446 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD; TAYLOR No. 21-16183

PACKWOOD,

D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00611-MMC Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; MARY P.

CAREY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Andrea Claire Wood and Taylor Packwood appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims

stemming from the placement of Wood’s children into foster care. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.