Friends Of Yosemite Valley v. Gale Norton

Good Law
366 F.3d 731·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 200404-15682California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

366 F.3d 731 FRIENDS OF YOSEMITE VALLEY, a non-profit corporation; Mariposans for Environmentally Responsible Growth (MERG), a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs — Appellants, v. Gale NORTON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; United States Department of the Interior; National Park Service; John Reynolds; David A. Mihalic, Defendants — Appellees. No. 04-15682. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 20, 2004. Sharon E. Duggan, Esq., Law Offices of Sharon E. Duggan, Berkeley, CA, Julia A. Olson, Esq., Wild Earth Advocates, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Elizabeth Ann Peterson, Esq., David C. Shilton, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Charles R. Shockey, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, E. Robert Wright, Esq., USF — Office of The U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Defendants-Appellees. Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 We write to clarify our Opinion of October 27, 2003, Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 796-99 (9th Cir.2003). There we held that the entire Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan ("CMP") is invalid due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.