People v. Samra CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2022C094211California1,709 words

Opinion

Opinion

Earl, J.

Filed 8/26/22 P. v. Samra CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Plumas) ----

THE PEOPLE, C094211

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 3049)

v.

STEVEN KEZMA SAMRA,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 1997, defendant Steven Kezma Samra was convicted of using a minor to sell marijuana. In March 2021, the trial court ruled defendant was ineligible for red esignation of that felony offense as a misdemeanor. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

We take our summary of many of the relevant facts from this court’s 2018 opinion in defendant’s prior appeal. (People v. Samra (Mar. 22, 2018, C084122 & C084726) [nonpub. opn.] (Samra).) In 1997,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.