Krizan Associates v. Pereira CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2022D079496California3,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/26/22 Krizan Associates v. Pereira CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KRIZAN ASSOCIATES, INC., D079496

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. v. 37-2019-00017335-CU-BC-CTL)

JOSEPH PEREIRA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Affirmed. Jerome R. Moe for Plaintiff and Respondent. Navigato & Battin, Michael W. Battin and Sandip S. Randhawa for Defendant and Appellant. Appellant Joseph Pereira contracted with respondent Krizan Associates, Inc. (Krizan), for it to provide landscape services at his home. Krizan sued Pereira for breach of contract. Following a bench trial, the court found for Krizan, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.