United States v. Thomas Merdzinski

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50287

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:08-cr-00139-SGL-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THOMAS HENRY MERDZINSKI, AKA

Tom Merdzinski,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Henry Merdzinski appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his second motion for early termination of supervised release under

U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Merdzinski first contends that the district court failed to explain adequately

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). its decision to deny…