United States v. James Jackson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202222-10095California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10095

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-01164-JGZ-EJM-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES COLE JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

James Cole Jackson appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jackson’s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have provided Jackson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.