Nathaniel Basola Sobayo v. Martin Musonge
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-60024California361 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MARTIN MUSONGE, No. 21-60024
Debtor, BAP No. 20-1060
------------------------------
MEMORANDUM*
NATHANIEL BASOLA SOBAYO,
Appellant,
v.
HIEN THI NGUYEN; MARTIN
MUSONGE,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Brand, Klein, and Taylor, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Nathaniel Basola Sobayo appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment dismissing for lack of standing Sobayo’s appeal from
the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the automatic stay. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo issues of
standing. Palmdale Hills…