Nathaniel Basola Sobayo v. Martin Musonge

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-60024California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARTIN MUSONGE, No. 21-60024

Debtor, BAP No. 20-1060

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

NATHANIEL BASOLA SOBAYO,

Appellant,

v.

HIEN THI NGUYEN; MARTIN

MUSONGE,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Brand, Klein, and Taylor, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Nathaniel Basola Sobayo appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment dismissing for lack of standing Sobayo’s appeal from

the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the automatic stay. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo issues of

standing. Palmdale Hills…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.