Melike Dewey v. Superior Court of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202222-55516California330 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELIKE DEWEY, No. 22-55516

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-09834-VBF-PLA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

County of Ventura; ERIK NASARENKO;

ALEXA LEIBL; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; GAVIN

NEWSOM; ROB BONTA; DOES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Dewey’s motion for in forma pauperis status (Docket Entry No. 3) is

granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Melike Dewey appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.