Melike Dewey v. Superior Court of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202222-55516California330 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MELIKE DEWEY, No. 22-55516
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-09834-VBF-PLA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Ventura; ERIK NASARENKO;
ALEXA LEIBL; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; GAVIN
NEWSOM; ROB BONTA; DOES,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Dewey’s motion for in forma pauperis status (Docket Entry No. 3) is
granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Melike Dewey appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
for lack of…