Martin Musonge v. Hien Nguyen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-60032California390 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MARTIN MUSONGE, No. 21-60032
Debtor, BAP No. 20-1184
------------------------------
MEMORANDUM*
NATHANIEL BASOLA SOBAYO,
Appellant,
v.
HIEN THI NGUYEN; ROBERT K. LANE;
DANIEL BUTT; KHIEM NGUYEN;
AVALON NGUYEN GARDNER LIVING
TRUST; HONG JACQUELINE
GARDNER; MARTIN MUSONGE,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Spraker, Gan, and Brand, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Nathaniel Basola Sobayo appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate
Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment
dismissing the involuntary Chapter 7 petition Sobayo filed against…