Martin Musonge v. Hien Nguyen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-60032California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARTIN MUSONGE, No. 21-60032

Debtor, BAP No. 20-1184

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

NATHANIEL BASOLA SOBAYO,

Appellant,

v.

HIEN THI NGUYEN; ROBERT K. LANE;

DANIEL BUTT; KHIEM NGUYEN;

AVALON NGUYEN GARDNER LIVING

TRUST; HONG JACQUELINE

GARDNER; MARTIN MUSONGE,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Spraker, Gan, and Brand, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Nathaniel Basola Sobayo appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment

dismissing the involuntary Chapter 7 petition Sobayo filed against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.