Jose Rosas-Arroyo v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202220-70100California475 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ROSAS-ARROYO, No. 20-70100
Petitioner, Agency No. A072-128-281
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 26,2022** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ,*** District Judge. Dissent by Judge VANDYKE.
Jose Rosas-Arroyo, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him removable.…